The Discourses on Livy and the Art of War

April 27, 2022 Post a Comment

Published in 1521, "The Art of War" by Machiavelli echoes the Treaty of the chinese philosopherDominicus Tzu.

In Machiavelli'south Philosophy, the question of war is oftentimes the horizon of politic questions. Politics and war are e'er mixed, often inseparable, that the State should establish relations between them, but even within states, provinces and cities. We will merely treat one aspect of this question: how the controversy of Machiavelli confronting weapons and mercenaries and auxiliaries for the "ain weapon" is one of the main construction of the whole of the work, one of the elements that give significant to the texts. The error of non having understood the importance of "own weapons" and the office of the infantry is one of the "sins of princes" of the time of the wars of Italy in the writing of texts Machiavelli we feel a abiding endeavor to understand how one could purchase, "redeem" (redimere), these sins. It is this attempt that this article attempts to highlight.

In this seven-book volume written in the form of mock dialogue, the Florentine condemned past the vocalisation of Captain Fabrizio Colonna, the weakness of the armies of Renaissance Italy and plans to meliorate their military effectiveness in the example of the ancients. Veterans, Machiavelli refers to the Greeks but as well to the Romans, whose military strategies shelling occupies almost the bulk of the work.Fabrizio looks first to the limerick and recruitment of troops.

He refutes the idea that an army can be formed by professionals who are always risks becoming after a moment too powerful like the Roman Praetorian Guard. The use of foreign mercenaries selling to the highest bidder is also prohibited.

Fabrizio advocates the lifting of soldiers among the mutual people who will have been educated and trained regularly to be fix when the fourth dimension came to serve under arms to protect their homeland. Its main thought is to restore the power of the infantry, the cavalry existence relegated to an auxiliary role. Examples for this are the compactness of the Greek phalanx, but more the remarkable performance of the Roman legions that were most invincible in their time.

Fabrizio relies heavily on the organization of the legions, their calorie-free infantry (archers and casters) called velites and the triple row of heavy infantry (hastaires, princes and triarii) making up the center from the strike force of the legions. The German armies but too Swiss then deemed as the most powerful at the fourth dimension of Machiavelli, do not stand well in comparison with the Roman legions.

Fabrizio then describes at length the maneuvers needed to train troops by insisting on their overall consistency. Driven past his interlocutors to speak on the artillery, it minimizes the impact of heavy arms equally highly dependent on geography that can greatly impact its accuracy, and put in the hard light artillery, did not choice but to rely on the speed of his troops to arrive equally before long every bit possible in melee.

In the quaternary book, Fabrizio discusses the aspect of choosing the best site to engage the battle and the command to motivate his troops.

Then, Fabrizio continues on art to accustom the soldiers to an austere diet, command of their pay, the prohibition of pillage private to severe punishment for disobedience and the rewards of valor, in lodge to inculcate a source of fe discipline their greater efficiency.

The sixth book is devoted to the construction of camps focusing more on the work of soldier conscripted every bit laborers on the choice of the field and how to defend the camps effectively.

In the last book, Fabrizio discusses the fine art of building fortifications capable of sustaining a siege.

In that location is considerable discussion of ramparts, moats, towers, outposts of the art supplies, counter spy or attack the enemy on another front to forcefulness him to leave his position .

In conclusion, "The Fine art of War" is a reference to his time, a technical manual that deals with a detailed and systematic vision of Machiavelli to restore prestige to the troops in his country.

The almost systematic adoption of the Roman model in a time when the artillery had revolutionized the art of war can show a character for me also narrow and rigid theories presented. Indeed the farther progress of the mechanical (precision and ability of guns, machine guns stride) will before long make its considerations increasingly difficult to hold. Of grade the look control will always be relevant but I found the same registry book of Sun Tzu, more than complete, more flexible and subtle in its general arroyo.

[ad#ad-one]

Enhanced by Zemanta